Legal Opinion

Lee v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 31, 1932No. 3533PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This appeal involves the dutiable classification of a Chinese food material known as birds’ nests. There is no specific provision in the Tariff Act of 1922 for the importation, and it must find its classification in the nonenumerated paragraph as a raw or unmanufactured article at 10 per centum ad valorem, or as a manufactured article at 20 per centum ad valorem, which paragraph reads as follows:

Pak. 1459. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid on the importation of all raw or unmanufactured articles not enumerated or provided for, a duty of 10 per centum ad valorem, and on all…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Smillie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  3. United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API