Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Houston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1911No. Appeal, No. 190PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal, No. 190, Oct. T., 1910, by William D. Houston, a defendant, from decree awarding partition of C. P. Lawrence Co., March T., 1908, No. 4, in case of Polly Permelia Cooley et al. v. William D. Houston, John Clark, George Clark and Elsie Trask. Bill in equity for partition of real estate. Before Porter, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was decree of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

This was a bill filed for partition of 162 acres of land in Lawrence county. The case was heard on the bill and answer, no replication was filed and no testimony was taken. The facts, therefore, appear by the pleadings.

Hamilton Houston owned a farm of 162 acres in Lawrence county. The title passed from him, apparently by deed, to his two sons, James and William, on or about May 30, 1876. On that date the sons gave him a mortgage in the penal sum of $10,000 conditioned for the pay*498ment of certain moneys for the support of their father and mother. The deed has…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  3. Estate of WoodburnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Dickinson v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  5. Kreiser's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Shaffer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Fox v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Lloyd's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Brandon v. MckinneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Knight v. KnightCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API