Legal Opinion

Fox v. Fox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1926No. 15735PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

While there are numerous parties named as defendants, now plaintiffs in error, there appears to be no issue except between plaintiff Roscoe C. Pox and defendant Charles S. Fox.

Plaintiff alleges his father, J. N. Pox, hereafter called the deceased, purchased the southwest quarter of section 33, township 12 north, range 6 west of the Indian meridian, in Canadian county, about 1897, and entered into an agreement with the plaintiff by the terms of which deceased agreed to devise to the plaintiff the south half of the southwest quarter of said section 33, provided plaintiff would…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Willet v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. Medill v. SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Oles v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Blaydes' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Griffin Grocery Co. v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Porter v. HansenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Crawford v. BriantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  5. Kinnett v. GoodnoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API