Legal Opinion

Knight v. Knight

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 6, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Petition by George P. Knight against William K. Knight for partition. Heard on petition and answer. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The petitioner alleged a tenancy in common with the respondent of a tract of land containing about nineteen acres in Kent county, created under the residuary clause of the will of Elizabeth J. Knight, and a copy of her will is made a part of the petition. By the will, after disposing of certain property, the testatrix gave all the rest, residue and remainder of her estate to her two sons, the petitioner and respondent, respectively. By his answer the respondent alleged that the testatrix was seized of the nineteen-acre tract at the time of her death; denies that it was devised…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Florence v. . HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Van Schuyver v. . MulfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Cooley v. HoustonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Rich v. BrayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1889
  5. Milbourn v. DavidSuperior Court of Delaware · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peters v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. Smith, Et Ux. v. Lemp, Et Ux.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
  3. Small v. AdamsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  4. Huston v. LambertCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
  5. Sarde v. SardeOrphan's Court of Delaware · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API