Legal Opinion

Lebovitz v. Mudd

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 22, 1987No. 22741PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Acting Associate Justice:

This appeal involves two consolidated cases. The circuit court, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, dismissed appellants’ causes of action alleging fraudulent conveyances. The court further ordered that notices of lis pendens be stricken. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellants brought these actions against respondents and the other defendants for fraud and unfair trade practices in connection with sales of certain lands on Daufuskie Island. The complaints allege the individual respondents participated in a scheme to defraud appellants. Specifically,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitehurst v. AbbottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Miller v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  4. Coleman v. LawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Temple v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Mathis v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Carr v. GuerardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Audio Investments v. RobertsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2002
  5. Judy v. JudyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API