Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Arreola

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 26, 2006No. 04-10504PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, we consider whether in using the phrases “possesses” and “uses or carries,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) defines two offenses or two means of committing a single offense. We conclude that the statute defines one offense, and affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

Jose Arreola appeals his conviction for the usé of a firearm during the commission of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The circumstances that led to his conviction began in April 2001, when Arreola met Roberto Martinez, an undercover police officer, in a Taco Bell…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Tommy Owen HartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Larry HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. RiosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. HartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Harvey, LarryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API