United States v. Jose Arreola
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we consider whether in using the phrases “possesses” and “uses or carries,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) defines two offenses or two means of committing a single offense. We conclude that the statute defines one offense, and affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
Jose Arreola appeals his conviction for the usé of a firearm during the commission of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The circumstances that led to his conviction began in April 2001, when Arreola met Roberto Martinez, an undercover police officer, in a Taco Bell…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Tommy Owen HartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Larry HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. RiosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. HartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Harvey, LarryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007