United States v. Rios
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Rios appeals from the district court’s entry of judgment following his conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than one kilogram of a mixture or substance containing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 2(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
Rios contends that the district court’s admission of the testimony of Social Security Agent Paul Yokoyama was subject to the bar of equitable estoppel and was incompetent and inadmissible hearsay. Generally, “[w]e review a dis*232trict court’s decision to admit or exclude…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gloria Ann MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jaime Leon Gomez-NorenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Focus BankDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- United States v. Escarcega-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006