Legal Opinion
Theodore Leach, et al. v. Dennett Ingram, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 30, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01809Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 THEODORE LEACH, et. al., Case No. 2:22-cv-01809-RFB-NJK 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER 9 v. 10 DENNETT INGRAM, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 110), 14 Plaintiffs’ Motion to Appoint Receiver (ECF No. 123), and Defendants’ Motion to Strike (ECF 15 No. 130). For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to 16 Strike are partially granted. Meanwhile, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Appoint Receiver is denied. 17 18 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 19 On October…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.