Legal Opinion

Dutton v. Seevers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 13, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Hon. J. K. Johnson, Judge. Action to recover for the support of a child. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant. The verdict was set aside, and both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

This is an action by the administratrix of L. K. Dutton, deceased, for recovery of compensation for keeping, boarding and maintaining the child of Thomas Seevers. In 1876, Seevers married the daughter of L. K. Dutton, and the child in question was born to them July 8, 1877. When the child was six months old, the mother left her husband, and she and her father took the' child to the father’s home, where it was cared for and maintained by him until Dutton’s death, in January, 1890. In 1881 Seevers and his wife were divorced, and in said action it was decreed that the mother of the child “shall…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hall Oil Co. v. BarquinWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Guth v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Haman v. PrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Nichols v. Houghton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Julian v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API