Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Houghton Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1915No. Calendar No. 26,725PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Mandamus by George E. Nichols, special prosecuting attorney for the county of .Houghton, • against Eichard C. Flannigan, circuit judge, presiding in the county of Houghton, to compel the respondent to set aside an order granting a new trial in a prosecution for murder.

1Per curiam

An order having been made that the respondent, circuit judge presiding in the twelfth judicial circuit, show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue to compel him to set aside and vacate an order made by him in a cause recently pending before him in the circuit court for the county of Houghton entitled the “People of the State of Michigan v. James Cooper, Arthur Davis, William Groff, and Edward Polkinghorne,” wherein said respondent by said order, dated the 19th day of January, 1915, directed that the verdict and judgment finding the above-named defendants guilty of the *656crime…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. SwiftMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Culp v. SteereSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Dean v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  4. Mirrielees v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Tores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lehman v. LehmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. HurwichMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. McCrea v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  4. People v. ParkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API