Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Dorius

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1976No. 14064PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

On appeal is a judgment of the trial court sustaining a trial examiner’s revocation of plaintiff’s driver’s license. We reverse, for the reason plaintiff’s license is not subject to revocation.

In this matter, the affidavit of the officer states that plaintiff was’ arrested at 9:45 a. m. and the time of her refusal was 9:50 a. m. According to the arresting officer, Nichols, he and a fellow officer removed plaintiff from her vehicle, placed her under arrest, handcuffed her and put her in a police car. Officer Nichols testified they left her in the police vehicle alone for four…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BockIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mills v. SwansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beck v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. CarlyleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Lee v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Beck v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hyde v. DoriusUtah Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API