Legal Opinion

People v. Carlyle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 23, 1985No. 83-1124PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reinhard

Following a hearing conducted pursuant to the Illinois implied-consent statute (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1982 Supp., ch. 951/2, par. 11— 501.1), the trial court found the State had met its burden on the issues required to be proved under the implied-consent statute, and denied Michael T. Carlyle’s request for a finding that he did not refuse to submit to a breathalyzer test.

Carlyle appeals from that decision, contending on appeal that the State failed to prove that he refused to submit to the breathalyzer test.

The parties entered into an agreed record of the proceedings below, signed by the trial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hoban v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. RinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. RolfingsmeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Department of Motor Vehicles v. McElwainWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State Department of Highways v. NormandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. WegielnikIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. GoodmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. People v. GaddiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. People v. HuisingaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API