Legal Opinion

Application of Kurt Hugo Folke Lundberg

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 14, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6330PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 1 to 5, inclusive, which are the •only claims of appellant’s application for a patent on a flow control valve.

Claims 1 and 5 are representative and read :

“1. A flow-control valve comprising a valve body having a flow passage through it and a cylindrical chamber formed transversely across it, and a rectangular plate valve member disposed diametrically in and rockable about the axis of said •chamber, the flow-obstructing portions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. In re DalzellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. In re PollackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. La Maur, Inc. v. DeMert & Dougherty, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API