Legal Opinion

Ceres Fertilizer, Inc. v. Beekman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1981No. 43754PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

Ceres Fertilizer, Inc., has appealed from an order and judgment on the mandate of the District Court for Gage County which directed that funds held by the clerk of the District Court be paid to Fred Beekman’s assignees. The funds had been held pursuant to an attachment which had been determined to be invalid upon appeal to this court in Ceres Fertilizer, Inc. v. Beekman, 205 Neb. 768, 290 N.W.2d 199 (1980). The appellant assigns as error: (1) The trial court’s finding that by bringing suit on the note, plaintiff had made an election of remedies and therefore precluded future reliance upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cracco v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Alter v. Bank of StockhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ruidoso State Bank v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bilar, Inc. v. ShermanColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Barnes v. BurkeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Coones v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Borley Storage & Transfer Co. v. WhittedNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State Bank of Piper City v. A-Way, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Central Accept. Corp. v. Colonial Bank of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. State v. McColeryNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API