Legal Opinion
Milline v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 26, 2004No. 99-CF-1375PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlickman, Associate J.
An undercover police officer witnessed a drug transaction and radioed a “lookout” for the suspects involved. Within one minute, officers responding to the scene stopped appellant Maurice Milline and his companion. After the undercover officer confirmed Milline’s identity as one of the subjects of his lookout, the police searched Milline and recovered heroin and cocaine. Milline was arrested and eventually tried and convicted of possession with intent to distribute heroin and possession of cocaine.
Milline claims in this appeal that the trial court should have granted his Fourth Amendment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Peay v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States v. Albert Lee HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Plummer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bennett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ellis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Henson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hampleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.