United States v. Albert Lee Hawkins

Opinion PER CURIAM.

Police officers using binoculars observed appellant Hawkins participating in a series of what appeared to be drug transactions. Maintaining their surveillance, they radioed details of his activities to their supervisor, who was stationed some blocks away. The supervisor later arrived on the scene and arrested appellant. He was indicted for narcotic violations, and tried by a jury and found guilty. 1 Now appealing, he cites three evidentiary rulings. We conclude that none warrants reversal.

I

Initially, appellant challenges the denial of his motion to suppress $393 discovered…