Legal Opinion

Wiesemann v. Pavlat

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1967No. 32492PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal presents a question of proper use of MAI right-of-way instructions in a boat collision case governed by maritime law. The suit was for damages suffered by the parties when their outboard motorboats collided on the Lake of the Ozarks. Each claimed the right of way under maritime law. The jury found against plaintiff William C. Wiesemann on his petition and against defendant Edward Pavlat on his counterclaim. The defendant was satisfied with the dogfall, but plaintiff moved for a new trial and appealed when that was denied.

The ultimate issue below was who had the right of way.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frechin v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Pigg v. BridgesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. The GulfstarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  4. Tidewater Associated Oil Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
  5. Jameson v. FoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rickman Ex Rel. Rickman v. SauerweinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  2. Thomas v. FitchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State v. DiamondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Davis v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Howe v. BowmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API