Legal Opinion

Tidewater Associated Oil Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 20, 1945No. 2628 CivilPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

Statutes under which the libel was brought:

This suit in admiralty was instituted by the filing of a libel on December 14, 1942, by the libellant, Tidewater Associated Oil Company, a corporation, as owner of the American tank steamship, hereinafter referred to for military security as libellant’s vessel “A”, against the respondent, United States of America, as owner and operator of the steamship, hereinafter referred to for like military security, as respondent’s vessel “B”, in a cause of collision, civil and maritime, pursuant to and by virtue of the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Belden v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. The MartelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. The ScotiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. The Great RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Union Oil Company of California v. The Tug Mary Malloy, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. In re Socony Vacuum Transp. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. Wiesemann v. PavlatMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Davies v. CollinsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1972
  5. In the Matter of the Petition of O. L. Schmidt Barge Lines, Inc., as Owner of the Motor Vessel Mary R, for Exoneration From or Limitation of LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API