Legal Opinion

The Continental Supply Co. v. Hutchings

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 23, 1954No. 14777PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

' This is a suit on a promissory note brought by appellant as plaintiff against appellee as defendant. Appellee successfully defended on the ground that he had resided in the State of Texas for twelve months as provided by Art. SS43 Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Stats., hence was entitled to rely on our four-year statute of limitations.

The material facts are undisputed. While a resident of the State of Mississippi, appellee on October 31, 1946, executed a note due on demand in the sum of $45,-913.75. Appellee removed to and resided in the State of Texas from February 1,, 1948 until…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Davis v. HoweTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Snoddy v. CageTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Whittenberg v. CravenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Thompson v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Transport Company v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Central Power and Light Company v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. State v. Williamson-Dickie Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Bailey v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Commercial Credit & Control Data Corp. v. Wheeler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API