Burns v. Caskey
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Delta. (Stone, J.) Argued December 12 and 13, 1893. Decided April 17, 1894. Bill to reform a contract and for an injunction. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The bill was filed in this case to reform a certain written contract executed between complainants and defendant Caskey, as well as to enjoin defendants Curtis and Wylie, the assignees of ‘the contract, from prosecuting & suit at law thereon. The contract is as follows:
“This agreement, made this 6th day of May, 1889, by and between Charles W. Caskey, of Petoskey, Michigan, of the first part, and Charles E. Burns, John K. Stack, John J. Bigney, and George Preston, of the city of Escanaba, Michigan, as follows:
“ The first party agrees to sell and convey to the second parties, to each an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vary v. SheaMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- McGraw v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crane v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Emery v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Kinyon v. CunninghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Holda v. GlickMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Kruger v. AgnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.