Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Beghtel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1951No. 31647PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

The appellant seeks reversal of a judgment dismissing her action after the court sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint and upon her refusal to plead further.

The amended complaint alleged that appellant and her deceased husband owned a tract of land, the east one half of which they had conveyed to Albert E. and Mae J. Price. The deed contained a number of restrictions, with a provision that a breach thereof should “cause said realty to revert to said grantors, their heirs, executors, administrators and successors, who shall have the right of immediate reentry upon said realty. . . . ”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Post v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Bauby v. KrasowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Johnson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. Ball v. MillikenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Everett Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Waxed Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harting v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Harting v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Canterbury Shores Associates v. Lakeshore Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Hamilton v. Kiona-Benton Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Moody v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API