Hamilton v. Kiona-Benton Irrigation District
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.
These cases were consolidated for trial, and for the appeals of defendants from the judgments entered upon the verdicts in each case. They are tort actions for damages claimed by plaintiffs because of the alleged negligent failure of defendants to furnish an adequate supply of water for plaintiffs’ land.
The statement of facts has been stricken. Hamilton v. Kiona-Benton Irr. Dist., 44 Wn. (2d) 421, 426, 268 P. (2d) 446 (1954). Consequently, all of the assignments of error directed to matters occurring during the trial, which are dependent upon the statement of facts for consideration, cannot…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caron v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Hamilton v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Forseth v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Nicholson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Coats v. West Coast Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Goodner v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Goodner v. CHICAGO, MIL. ETC., R. CO.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
- Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972