Pennfield Corp. v. Meadow Valley Electric, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
Appellant Meadow Valley Electric, Inc. (“appellant”), appeals from the December 13, 1990, order of the trial court sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer filed by appellee York Electrical Supply Co., t/d/b/a YESCO (“appellee”). The appellant asserts novel arguments which we find to be pernicious to accepted rules of establishing causation and liability. In particular, appellant’s arguments would obviate the well-settled rule that “alternative liability” will not lie absent some sort of negligent conduct by the potential tortfeasors. It asks that we…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Firing v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Hurt v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- City Of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- McNeil v. City of EastonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.