Legal Opinion
State v. Houston
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 29, 1941No. 32,810PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from a municipal court judgment convicting defendant of violating an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis “relating to the purchase and sale of eggs.”
Section 14 of the ordinance purports to establish grades for the retail trade of eggs in Minneapolis. The grades so established are Grade “A,” Grade “A” Medium or Small, and Grade “B.” All eggs that are not graded must be marked “unclassified.” Nothing in the ordinance makes grading compulsory. The quality factors for each grade are specified in the. ordinance. For example, the quality factors for Grade…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Evison v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- State v. BargeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Knobloch v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State v. SugarmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Sun Oil Company v. Village of New HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- State v. United Parking Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.