Legal Opinion
Ayers v. Securities & Exchange Commission
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 11, 1980No. CV-79-85-GFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HATFIELD, District Judge.
This action is before the court on the motions of plaintiffs to stay defendant Security and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) investigation of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs seek the stay pending discovery by plaintiffs into the motives behind the SEC investigation. Plaintiffs have also moved, pursuant to Rules 6(d) and 30(a), F.R.Civ.P., for leave to take early discovery. Plaintiffs allege that this court has jurisdiction over these motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331(a) (federal question), 1337(a) (legislation under Commerce Clause).
The court shall state the facts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,017 Securities and Exchange Commission, and Cross-Appellant v. Brigadoon Scotch Distributing Co., and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cook v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Family Television, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- National Credit Union Administration v. Beacon Community Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980