Legal Opinion
Speller v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 13, 1988No. 116-85CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending before the court is the October 14, 1987 motion of non-party Litton Industries, Inc. (“Litton”) to Quash Subpoena as it relates to plaintiffs written deposition question # 3(a).1 Alternatively, Litton asks for a protective order to deny this discovery until after liability is established by plaintiff (“Speller”). After consideration of the parties’ submissions regarding the propriety of question # 3(a), including supplemental briefs discussing the impact of two recent decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Nancy Deitchman, Paula Renfroe, and Dr. Arthur L. Herbst, Witness-Appellee v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amergen Energy Co. Ex Rel. Exelon Generation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Rice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Murata Manufacturing Co. v. Bel Fuse, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- PYROTECHNICS MANAGEMENT, INC. v. XFX PYROTECHNICS LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021