Legal Opinion

Town of Miami v. City of Globe

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 3, 1998No. 2CA-CV98-0025PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Town of Miami challenged appellee City of Globe’s annexation of land west of Globe, claiming that the parcel to be annexed was not contiguous to Globe as required by A.R.S. § 9-471(A)(l) and defined by § 9-471(H)(3). Although the trial court found Miami had standing to challenge the annexation, the court granted summary judgment in favor of Globe on the ground that Globe had substantially complied with the statutory annexation requirements. Because Globe was required to strictly, rather than substantially, comply with the statutory requirement that a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Alaface v. National Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Martinez v. Woodmar IV Condominiums Homeowners Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. B Bar Enterprises, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mobilisa, Inc. v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of InitiativeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Cornman Tweedy 560, LLC v. City of Casa GrandeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Nickerson v. Green Valley Recreation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Grandote Golf & Country Club, LLC v. Town of La VetaColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API