Legal Opinion

Giambra v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1983No. 95PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This action was commenced by appellants who seek compensation under fire insurance policies issued by appellees for damage to the Giambras’ building. It is undisputed that the building, located in Pittston, Pennsylvania, was damaged in the amount of $159,541. At issue before us is appellants’ contention that there was insufficient evidence adduced at trial to put before the jury certain defenses raised by appellees. Appellees had raised the defenses that they were not obligated to compensate appellants for their loss on the grounds that the fire which damaged the building was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ChernickySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. NasutiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Miller v. CHECKER YELLOW CAB CO., ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Rusidoff v. DeBolt Transfer, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lokay v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Maravich v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Travelers Insurance v. NamerowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Tagouma v. Investigative Consultant Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Carlson Min. Co. v. Titan Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API