In Re Estate of Firle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1ConcurrenceStone, Justice
I concur in the result because there Avas no power in the probate court to decide the question of relationship, by adoption or other-AA'ise, at the time and in the manner its decision Avas attempted. That decision and the resulting order are nullities. In my judgment that is all there is to the case.
But if I am Avrong in the foregoing, and there is occasion so to enlarge the field of discussion as to include the effect, as res adjudicates, of an order appointing an administrator, I cannot agree with the implications of the third subdivision of the opinion that an order appointing an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Howell v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- White v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Austro-Hungarian Consul v. G. A. WestphalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Caujolle v. FerrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.