Legal Opinion

Shuck v. Hendershot

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1959No. 41,521PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This is a common-law action for damages for personal injury based on alleged negligence of defendants.

The joint demurrer of defendants Hendershot and Singleton, and the separate demurrer of defendant Smith, to the amended petition (hereafter referred to as petition), were overruled. The appeal is from those rulings.

The basic question involved is whether the petition shows on its face that plaintiff’s recovery is confined to the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act.

Despite our reluctance to encumber an opinion with lengthy quotation of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Bright v. BraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Hoffman v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Lamb v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Woods v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Nussbaum v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. of MaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. Schafer v. Kansas Soya Products Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Davis v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  5. Wilburn Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Boeing Airplane Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API