Legal Opinion

Hoey v. Hawkins

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 22, 1975PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

This is an appeal from a jury verdict for damages in a personal injury action. Liability had been admitted. Plaintiff argues that the Trial Court prejudicially erred in admitting into evidence certain motion picture film. He claims unfair surprise and a violation of the Discovery Rules in that he did not learn of the existence of the film until trial had begun.

I

Plaintiff seeks damages for injuries allegedly received in a vehicular collision on July 7, 1971. He says that he has a permanent back injury which impairs his ability to bend, lift and perform manual work generally.

A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Olszewski v. HowellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  3. Young v. SaroukosSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coleman v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Norquay v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Concord Towers, Inc. v. LongSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  4. Alberts v. All About Women, P.A.Superior Court of Delaware · 2020
  5. Alberts v. All About Women, P.A.Superior Court of Delaware · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API