Concord Towers, Inc. v. Long
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
McNEILLY, Justice:
Defendant appeals from a Superior Court jury’s award of damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of a fall at defendant’s restaurant. Defendant argues eight reasons why the verdict should be set aside and a new trial granted.
I
Defendant first argues that a defense eyewitness’ prior statement was improperly admitted because plaintiff failed to reveal the existence of the statement in violation of his duty to update his answers to interrogatories pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 26(e). 1
Plaintiff filed the following answers to defendant’s interrogatories:
1.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robelen Piano Company v. Di FonzoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Young v. SaroukosSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
- Debernard v. ReedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Hoey v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
- Beck v. HaleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
3Cited by13 opinions
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Cline v. Prowler Industries of MaryLand, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Coleman v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. FitzgeraldNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.