Legal Opinion

O'Halloran v. Marriage

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 4, 1926No. 25,321PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Defendants appeal from an order denying a new trial. The sole question presented is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding of the trial court that a mortgage executed to plaintiff by defendant Eichard A. Marriage and his wife, defendant Mabel Marriage, for the sum of $2,200 is a purchase money mortgage and therefore superior and paramount to a mortgage executed by the same parties to defendant Interstate Securities Company for the sum of $18,000.

Plaintiff’s husband died intestate in July, 1919, and plaintiff was duly appointed administratrix of his estate. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Schoch v. BirdsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Marin v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Jacoby v. CroweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. ChojnackiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Slattengren & Sons Properties, LLC v. RTS River Bluff, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API