O'Halloran v. Marriage
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Defendants appeal from an order denying a new trial. The sole question presented is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding of the trial court that a mortgage executed to plaintiff by defendant Eichard A. Marriage and his wife, defendant Mabel Marriage, for the sum of $2,200 is a purchase money mortgage and therefore superior and paramount to a mortgage executed by the same parties to defendant Interstate Securities Company for the sum of $18,000.
Plaintiff’s husband died intestate in July, 1919, and plaintiff was duly appointed administratrix of his estate. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stewart v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Schoch v. BirdsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Marin v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Jacoby v. CroweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. ChojnackiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Slattengren & Sons Properties, LLC v. RTS River Bluff, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011