Legal Opinion

State v. Marble

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2005No. 04-280PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶ 1 Cody William Marble (Marble) appeals from the judgment entered by the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, on his conviction and sentence for the offense of sexual intercourse without consent. We affirm.

¶2 Marble raises the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in denying Marble’s

motion to excuse a juror for cause?

¶4 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in instructing the jury regarding witness credibility?

BACKGROUND

¶5 In March of2002, the State of Montana (State) charged Marble by information with the felony offense of sexual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. James Ray McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. State v. HeathMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. FreshmentMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BurkhartMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. GrindheimMontana Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. JonasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. State v. Richard CrosleyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. GolieMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. RobinsonMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Marble v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API