Legal Opinion

Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 88-9752PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JAMES McGIRR KELLY, District Judge.

Presently before the court are Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff and Counterclaim The Home Indemnity Company’s (“The Home”) Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiffs Rhone-Poulene Rorer, Inc. (“Rorer”) and Armour Pharmaceutical Company (“Armour”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), Fourth-Party Defendant Pacific Employers Insurance Company’s (“PEIC”) Motion for Summary Judgment as to Policy No. XMO 01 1108. The parties have extensively briefed these matters and a hearing was held on July 19, 1993. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. Home Indem. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993