Legal Opinion
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. Home Indem. Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 3, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 88-9752Published
1Opinion of the Court
832 F.Supp. 114 (1993)
RHONE-POULENC RORER INC. and Armour Pharmaceutical Company, Plaintiffs,
v.
The HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, et al., Third-Party Defendants, and Revlon, Inc., Third-Party Defendant and Fourth-Party Plaintiff,
v.
CITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, et al., Fourth-Party Defendants.
Civ. A. No. 88-9752.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
August 3, 1993.
Stephen J. Mathes, William R. Herman, Hoyle, Morris & Kerr, Philadelphia, PA, for Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc. and Armour…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.