Legal Opinion
Matter of the Application of Gordon M. De Jarlais
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 15, 1956No. Patent Appeals 6171PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary Examiner rejecting as unpatentable to appellant claims 6, 10, 11, 15, 16, and 20 of appellant’s application for a reissue patent relating to “Motor Cool ing Systems.” Claims 1 to 5, and 24 to 27 were allowed.
The claims on appeal relate to a reissue application, filed October 30, 1952, of Patent No. 2,459,311, issued January 18, 1949.
The examiner rejected the claims for various reasons. The first reason was that all of the claims were broadened…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powder Co. v. Powder WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Matter of the Application of Anna Rosalie Nelson Byers, of the Estate of Laud S. Byers, DeceasedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Ruth E. Riley v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc., a Corporation (Formerly Broadway Department Store, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MBO LABORATORIES, INC. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- St. Regis Paper Company v. Tee-Pac, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1973
- International Minerals & Chemical Corp. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960