Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

(PC) Bailey v. Cox

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 14, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00757Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 TIMOTHY BAILEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF 12 v. RETALIATION CLAIM 13 T. COX, et al., (ECF No. 1) 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 18

403 U.S. 388

(1971). 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed June 22, 2022. 20 I. 21 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 22 The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API