Legal Opinion

Leventhal v. Knapek

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 26, 2001No. Docket No. 00-9306PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge:

After receiving anonymous allegations that an employee reasonably suspected to be plaintiff-appellant Gary Leventhal was neglecting his duties in the Accounting Bureau of the New York State Department of Transportation (“DOT”), DOT investigators, without Leventhal’s consent, printed out a list of the file names found on Leventhal’s office computer. The list of file names contained evidence that certain non-standard software was loaded on Leventhal’s computer. This led to additional searches confirming that Leventhal had a personal tax preparation program on his office…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Matusick v. Erie County Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Brandon Michael LifshitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Albert J. Muick v. Glenayre ElectronicsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re Asia Global Crossing, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API