Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bergan
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMichael J. Kelly, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals by leave granted an order of the circuit court reversing the district court’s judgment of a land contract forfeiture in favor of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (fdic). The circuit court held as a matter of law that the fdic is subject to the interest forfeiture provision of the Michigan usury statute, MCL 438.32; MSA 19.15(2), and that the fdic. therefore was not entitled to collect back interest on defendant’s land contract. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The facts of this case are not in dispute. In 1982, defendant, Eric Bergan, entered into a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. T.F. Stone-Liberty Land Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Professional Asset Management, Inc. v. Penn Square Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1983
- Morris v. Resolution Trust Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Washburn v. MichailoffMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Washburn v. MichailoffMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000