Legal Opinion
Washburn v. Michailoff
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 28, 2000No. Docket No. 216768PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
Plaintiff Gary Washburn appeals as of right from the trial court’s order denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10) and instead granting summary disposition for defendants under MCR 2.116(I)(2). We affirm. Defendants cross appeal as of right from the trial court’s denial of their request for attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Defendant Mary Michailoff executed a $40,000 promissory note payable to plaintiff Washburn, with *671an interest rate of ten percent and monthly payments of $667. Defendant Michael Makedonsky signed the note as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Sharper Image Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- State-William Partnership v. GaleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Wilcox v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Consumers Power Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rataj v. City of RomulusMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Kyocera Corp. v. Hemlock Semiconductor, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Local Area Watch v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Detroit Free Press, Inc v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Donald F. Riesett v. W.B. Doner & Company Doner International, Limited, D/B/A Doner & Company, Limited, D/B/A Doner Cardwell Hawkins, Donald F. Riesett v. W.B. Doner & Company Doner International, Limited, D/B/A Doner & Company, Limited, D/B/A Doner Cardwell HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.