Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 7, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00366Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 24CV366-MMA(BLM) 11 MIGUEL RAMIREZ, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION 13 v. FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT LIMITED DISCOVERY 14 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, MARIA LOPEZ, AND DOES 1-15, 15 [ECF NO. 17] Defendants. 16 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s April 19, 2024 Application for Leave to 18 Conduct Limited Discovery [ECF No. 17 (“Mot.”)] and Defendants’ April 22, 2024 response to 19 the motion [ECF No. 18 (“Oppo.”). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is 20…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
  3. Gillespie v. CivilettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Wakefield v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. American Legalnet, Inc. v. DavisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API