Legal Opinion

Wright v. Arcade School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1964No. Civ. 10743PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Plaintiff, then a 5-year-old boy, was struck by an automobile while crossing a public street on his way to school. Through his guardian ad litem, he brought this negligence action against the automobile driver and the school district. At the completion of his trial counsel’s opening statement, the court granted the school district’s motion for nonsuit and plaintiff appeals.

A nonsuit following the plaintiff’s opening statement should be granted “ “only where it is clear that counsel has undertaken to state all of the facts which he expects to prove, and it is plainly evident that the facts…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Richardson v. HamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hoyem v. Manhattan Beach City School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API