Legal Opinion

Roth v. City of Glendale

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2000No. 97-3467PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 1. Petitioners, retired employees of the City of Glendale, seek review of a published decision of the court of appeals that affirmed the circuit court order of summary judgment in favor of the City.1 The retirees contend that the court of appeals erred in determining that they did not have a vested right to fully-paid health insurance benefits under a series of limited-term collective bargaining agreements. We conclude that a vesting presumption applies to these agreements in the absence of contrac*176tual language or extrinsic evidence indicating otherwise. Because the record here is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Farm Credit Services of North Central Wisconsin, ACA v. WysockiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Matthews v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Knight v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Marconi v. City of JolietAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API