Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 5, 2017No. D151569M; A160356PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for harassment and a supplemental judgment requiring defendant to pay $2,893.20 in restitution to the victim for her out-of-pocket medical expenses and lost wages. ORS 137.106.1

In ordering restitution, the trial court had concluded that, based on then-current case law, a causal connection existed between defendant’s criminal conduct and the victim’s economic damages because that conduct was the “but-for” cause of the victim’s injury. After the entry of the restitution judgment, the Supreme Court decided State v. Ramos, 358 Or 581, 368 P3d 446 (2016).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. AlonsoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. Gutierrez-MedinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. Xiu-ChableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API