State v. Alonso
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for third-degree rape, ORS 163.355, assigning error to the trial court’s imposition of a $3,000 compensatory fine. Defendant argues that the trial court lacked the statutory authority under ORS 137.101 to impose a compensatory fine because the victim’s tattoo was not the direct result of his crime and because the victim could not recover the costs for the tattoo removal in a civil action against defendant. We conclude that the state failed to advance a valid theory of civil liability under which the victim could recover the costs of the tattoo…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Piazza v. KellimOregon Supreme Court · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. GarlitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.