Legal Opinion

State v. Alonso

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 22, 2017No. C132730CR; A156777PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for third-degree rape, ORS 163.355, assigning error to the trial court’s imposition of a $3,000 compensatory fine. Defendant argues that the trial court lacked the statutory authority under ORS 137.101 to impose a compensatory fine because the victim’s tattoo was not the direct result of his crime and because the victim could not recover the costs for the tattoo removal in a civil action against defendant. We conclude that the state failed to advance a valid theory of civil liability under which the victim could recover the costs of the tattoo…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Piazza v. KellimOregon Supreme Court · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. GarlitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API