Legal Opinion

People v. Brancazio

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided February 8, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.

Defendant moves to abrogate the judgment of conviction. It brought Mm a sentence of three to five years in State prison for having had in his possession heroin, feloniously.

Originally, defendant had pleaded “not guilty” to the two counts of the indictment. At a later day he compromised by pleading guilty to the first count, which is the count that charges him with the felonious possession of heroin. The second count was absorbed in the compromise.

Defendant propounds several reasons for taking the present step. They are:

First. A violation of due process by permitting him to plead to a count…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Carr v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. People v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. People v. . FrudenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. People ex rel. Kurzynski v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Lowe v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ElfeNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1962
  2. People v. JonesNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1962
  3. People v. WoodruffNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1961
  4. People v. PonitzNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
  5. People v. PortnerNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API