Legal Opinion

People v. Ponitz

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided February 26, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.

Judicial pressure by the use of coercive means, causing a change from his plea of not guilty to one of guilty, is the reason given by defendant for instituting this coram nobis motion.

According to defendant, who was the sole witness for himself at the hearing, this incident took place on May 10, 1910, at the time of his arraignment to answer the indictment charging him with grand larceny. His version is that the sentencing Judge *326had then admonished him that, using defendant’s own language, “he don’t tolerate thieves. He says if the Court — if I go to trial and the Court finds me guilty, I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CanforaNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1957
  2. People v. MogaveroNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1957
  3. People v. VasquezNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1959
  4. People v. BrancazioNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
  5. People v. HullNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WoodruffNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1961
  2. People v. PortnerNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1962
  3. People v. MeyerleNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API