Legal Opinion

In re the claim of Gunnip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCasey, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 20, 1984, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive benefits.

The employer contends that the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board erred in finding that claimant had good cause for voluntarily leaving her employment. We disagree.

Whether a claimant’s separation from employment is “voluntary” and “without good cause” within the meaning of Labor Law § 593 (1) (a) in a particular case is usually a question of fact for the Board, whose decision is conclusive upon the courts if supported by substantial evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. In re the Claim of LaRoccaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. In re the Claim of DankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Stat ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. In re the Claim of WigutowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re Doktor HairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API