Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of LaRocca

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Unemployment insurance Appeal Board reinstated.

Claimant was charged by his employer with falsely reporting mileage traveled during the course of his employment as a motor vehicle operator for the New York City Department of Transportation. An informal conference was held by his employer, after which claimant was found guilty and suspended for 30 days.

Thereupon, claimant applied for unemployment benefits but was determined to be ineligible by the local board on the ground…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. In re the Claim of CahillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Claim of ArroyoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. In re the Claime of JimenezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of De BenedettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of BatemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. In re the claim of GunnipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API